The Meaning of Money
Chapter Three
The Third Layer
Diego Alfageme on purpose, and the rare founders worth backing
Read the transcript
All right. Well, welcome to the latest episode of the Meaning of Money, a live show for founders, investors, and families who have already made money and are now focused on what wealth should actually make possible. I'm the host, Stefan Whitwell, the founder and CEO of Whitwell and Company. Each episode explores what comes after financial success: freedom, family, health, wealth, purpose, investing, and legacy. And I'm excited to have today a special guest all the way from Lima, Peru: Diego. Welcome to the show. Hello, Stefan. Thanks for the invitation. I'm happy to be here. So Diego, tell us a little bit about what you're building in Lima, Peru.
Three hats: venture capital, social housing, and teaching
Amazing. I have like three hats, but my main work is being managing partner of ADN BC, which is a venture capital fund that focuses specifically in fintech and real estate tech, which are the topics that we know, pre-seed and seed, all around Latin America. We're investing so far in 12 startups, and we're looking to make a 25-startup portfolio. That's my main role. But I'm also a consultant at Habitat for Humanity, where I promote social housing through entrepreneurship and technology. Plus I am a professor at my university, teaching venture capital. Very much a Renaissance man, wearing multiple hats, as so many of us do today. And you're a dad, right? Yes. My kid is running around, my wife... I would argue that's probably your most important hat. True, true. Like 50, 60 percent, and then you have the remaining for everything else. That's right.
When money stops being about security: the third layer
So I'm really excited about our conversation today, because I think a lot of the issues that humanity faces — whether it's dads or entrepreneurs — are the same regardless of whether we're in Austin, Texas, which is where I sit, or Lima, Peru, which is where you are, or other parts of the world. So I appreciate you making time today to jump on the show. Tell me a little bit about — for you, when did money stop being about security and start being about meaning? Well, first there's the first layer, which is basic needs: drinking, eating, having a good house to live in. After that you have what you want to leave to your children — wealth, net worth, a house, which is a trust for them. But then there's a lot of people that start to get more and more and more, and the meaning — the third layer — is the hardest one, because now you need to do something not for your family, or for you to get a meal; now you need to do it for your inner me. And it's tough to know what you really like. But I think the goal is to work on something that you like, that you would be happy to do without even a payment.
Loving the work: Keith Richards and the joy before the money
I love that. When I think about it, the first guy that jumps to my mind is Elon Musk. In interviews he said, “Look, I'm not doing this because I want the money. I'm doing this because I really love the problem, I love trying to figure it out.” And interestingly enough, I read a book by Keith Richards from the Rolling Stones — the old... I mean, he looks like he's 200 years old. Very interesting guy, and it's not the kind of book I would normally read, but I somehow was gifted this book and started reading it, and it was an amazing book. One of the most touching parts of the book for me was, early on, when he and the others in the band were starting out, they didn't have any money. They were living on couches. They didn't have life insurance, they didn't have health insurance, they didn't know where their next meal was going to come from. But he describes a joy and a happiness that they had, because they would spend eight hours trying to find that perfect sound on the guitar, or that perfect rhythm, or something they were playing with musically that day. And that joy of loving what they're doing really comes through. So I think what you're saying, Diego, rings really true for me, resonates for me, because when you are doing something that you love doing, there's just a deeper satisfaction and value that comes to you from that, that money can't buy. Yes. And actually, now that I rephrase the question — for the past 10 years I have been working to raise enough capital to sustain my family. Now that I have raised the fund and I have the money in the bank, the purpose comes, because now I need to find those 25 startups that really amaze me and that I'm really passionate about. And that's the hardest part. Now that I have the money, everybody would say that's the tough part — no, no, the tough part is to invest it correctly and get a return for my colleagues and fellow workers.
How many founders build for love versus money
Let me ask you about that. How many of the founders you evaluate — I'm sure you look at a lot of different founders before making an investment in your venture — percentage-wise, how many of them are doing it because they love what they're doing, versus doing it to try to get rich? I think that's 60-40, at least — more people are doing it for money than for purpose. But it's true that just the upper 20 percent, 10 percent, has the ability to seek purpose, because the other 80 percent are paying their debts and taxes and stuff. But that's the 1 percent that we need to capture. So far we have seen 1,700 startups, and we have invested in 11. So it's less than 1 percent. We need to find that team — the team that is passionate about the purpose. And maybe the CEO is thinking about purpose, but the CTO and the CSO are thinking about money. It's the same, right?
What money can outsource — and what he never will
Tell me a little bit about — one of the great things about money is that money can solve certain things. Sometimes one of the joys of money is being able to use it to outsource certain tasks and things that need to get done, so you can reclaim some of your time and make life a little bit easier. Tell me: no matter how much money you have, what are you never going to outsource? What do you want to continue to be responsible for doing in your life? Kids and family time, for sure, on the personal side. And in ADN, the investing part — because at the beginning we were the analysts, the customer success, the investment committee. Now we are outsourcing the sourcing, like how the base of the startups comes in. But at some point, when we need to assess a one-pager or a memo, we won't outsource that, because that's the 15 years of experience we have in venture capital, and not even AI can understand it. And in the family, things like picking your son up from school — you could pay somebody to do it, but it's amazing to have time even with your kids' friends and get to know them. Those two things. I love that, and I don't think that can be outsourced. I'm a big fan of AI, and there are some things it does wonderfully, just like money. But there are some things that, thankfully, still need that human connection, that human touch.
Your calendar, not your balance sheet
What about — obviously the most scarce resource of all is time, right? You can't buy it back no matter how much money you have. You can't turn back the clock. I'm guessing part of your answer is going to be “dad,” but within the home or within your company, what gives you the highest return on your attention — not your capital, but your attention? Said differently: if I looked at your calendar, Diego, instead of your balance sheet, what would it tell me money means to you? That's a good question. Two or three takeaways. First of all, you would see a lot of conversations — with other funds, with our GPs, with our investment analysts. Maybe five meetings in a week, 30 minutes each. So you would say you're talking with a lot of entrepreneurs. Yes, but previously I talked with a lot of VCs that told me, “Hey, this is a good one, I like this one” — so it's a referral. Business is a trust business, and the best referrals usually come from a previous VC or investor that puts the conviction in. Then another big block of time in my agenda is the deep work. Sometimes when you have your calendar link open, you get a lot of meetings and you don't get a block of time to do what you need to do — a financial model, a presentation, send emails, respond. You need to block those in your calendar and be responsible with them. Not because it's your personal time you can do whatever you want — no, use the deep work block to work. And also, you would see one third, one fourth of my week is dedicated to the ecosystem — not exactly ADN. I'm president of PEDUTEC Week 2026, which is going to be October 12th here in Lima. So I would like to invite people to come. That's like an add-on. It takes me like five to ten hours weekly, but because I'm really passionate about it — I'm bringing people from the outside during one week where all the top-performing entrepreneurs are going to be here. So it's a good week to come.
What's happening in Lima and Peru
Well, tell me about that. Give me something special or interesting about the community there in Lima, or in Peru, that many of the people watching the show may not be aware of. What's something cool that's going on that should make Peru and Lima be on people's radar, if it's not already? Great. First, the food — the food is amazing. We have like five of the top hundred restaurants in the world here. Really good ones, like Maido and Central. Then the amount of entrepreneurs. Our economy is a little bit informal — like 60, 70 percent informal — a lot of independent people working for themselves. And we are really entrepreneurs; your first job usually is to do a stand or sell something on your block. Now, on the opportunity side, we need to shuffle those entrepreneurs toward venture capital, the next level up — because there's a lot of traditionalism.
Green flags: the character traits he looks for in founders
I love that, and I can see it as you describe that entrepreneurial culture. Time is running short, so I'm going to ask you one last question before we wrap for today. You meet a lot of people before you pick that 1 percent. What are one or two inner character traits of the people that make a big difference for you when you're ultimately deciding? You mean like green flags? When you see teams — not the business plan, not the economics; of course you analyze all that — but if you look at the character of the founder, their inside, what, if anything, are you looking for? What makes a big difference? Well, it's a combination. First, thrive — you can see a willingness to succeed. Then balance it with humbleness, to be humble enough. We are busy, we're criticizing a lot, we're asking, “I don't know why this and why that, and how are you going to...” So when people get defensive with us — okay, sorry to attack you, but open up so we can discuss. And most of them share, they even show us their numbers, they open it up. But some 20, 30 percent get a little bit closed off, and usually they're hiding something. Because if you are happy with what you are building, you would say everything. And another thing: the team. Again, the team. We are investing in pre-seed, so the solution is not that important, because it's going to move and change. The problem is important, but you're going to converge to a different market. But the team is the pillar. And a team is more than one, for me. For ADN, we have just made one solo-founder investment, because it's a hard thing to be an entrepreneur and to do it by yourself. Very, very well. What a great... I have five minutes more if you want, Stefan.
Why it takes a team — and why the company can't stop when the CEO does
Well, I love the team comment that you made there, Diego, because no matter what you do in life, it takes a team. Building a business is hard. When industries change and you have to adapt, that's hard. If you can get people focused on the mission... And one more thing that tends to happen a lot: you have one commander in chief, right? You have the CEO — even if you have a COO, CTO, CPO, the CEO is key. And when he is injured, with a broken leg or whatever, the company stops. That's not a team. A team is the one that can sustain a startup even when you are sick or traveling. I love that, because there are a lot of companies where if the CEO goes down, things just stop. And what I discover is that that often has to do with a lack of process, a lack of trust in their team, a lack of decentralized decision-making authority. I get that it can be scary for some people to let go, but you have to empower your team. You have to let people make decisions. I tell my team, “I'd rather you get it wrong, or do something differently than the way that I would prefer, than everything be held up waiting on me.” And it's a lot more fun, because people think differently than you, so they're going to come up with cool ideas that are better than ideas you would have. The beauty of a team. So that's exciting.
Fintech: SME lending and the markets they're chasing
You do a lot in fintech. What are some areas within fintech that are particularly interesting, just at a high level? And are the companies you're investing in primarily focused on serving Lima, or do they have an eye on regional or even global markets? Give us a little color on what you're doing there. Thank you for the question. Most of them are regional; a couple of them are just working in one country, but usually the big one — Mexico, for example. So far we don't have a Peruvian investment. We are looking for them, we are coaching a couple of founders. Within fintech, we are really interested in lending — SME lending. We think there's a big opportunity: 50, 60 percent of the market is not being well served by banks, and they are making a lot of money and giving jobs. So if we could support them with capital — which is not venture capital; it's capital to grow, usually with a margin on it. So we're looking a lot at lending, but through infrastructure — infrastructure for lending, for underwriting, risk monitoring, KYC, KYB — those services that you can sell to financial institutions for them to improve their operations.
Wrapping up: a global fintech panel, and staying connected
Well, I think there's room to improve all around the world, and we should probably organize a fund — get together at some point, convene a panel, a global panel on fintech issues, because it's quite dynamic. A lot of cool things are changing, and I'd value your perspective there. So Diego, thank you so much for joining today. I appreciate you opening up and sharing your perspective on the values that matter and how you're navigating wealth and values in your life, both at home and at work. So thank you again for joining. I hope you continue to see the success in your venture capital business, and also in your various community-building leadership roles. Amazing. Thanks again for the time, Stefan. Happy to be here. We are just investing our fund one. In one year we will end, and we will start raising our fund two. So hopefully we will stay connected, and I'm happy to do that fintech panel globally. I put my favorite Peruvian fintechs in the chat, and my LinkedIn and our website. That sounds great. I'll make sure to add the link so people can learn more about you. Thank you, Diego. Amazing. Take care. Take care. Bye-bye.
Transcript edited for readability from the video. Machine-transcribed; may contain minor errors.
Key Takeaways
A written companion to the episode, written for those who prefer to read.
Diego Alfageme answers the call from Lima with a toddler somewhere behind him and a wife, he says with a laugh, quietly grading his performance. He wears several hats: managing partner of a venture capital fund investing across Latin America, a consultant to Habitat for Humanity working on social housing, and a university professor teaching the next generation of investors. But the hat he names as most important, the one worth fifty or sixty percent of him, is father. It is a fitting place to begin, because Alfageme thinks about money in layers, and the deepest layer is not about provision at all.
The three layers of money
Ask him when money stopped being about security and started being about meaning, and he answers like someone who has mapped the territory. The first layer is basic needs: eating, drinking, a good house to live in. The second is what you leave your children, the wealth and the home held in trust for them. The third layer is the hardest, because once your family is provided for, the work no longer has to feed anyone. It has to answer to what he calls your inner self. "It is tough to know what you really like," he says. "The goal is to work on something you would be happy to do without even a payment."
He is candid that he has only recently arrived at that third layer himself. For ten years his work was, in effect, the second layer: raising enough capital to sustain his family. Now that his fund is closed and the money sits in the bank, he has discovered that the easy part is over, not beginning. "Everybody would say now that you have the money, that's the tough part," he says. "No. The tough part is to invest it correctly and get a return for your colleagues." The capital was never the point. Finding the handful of companies worth believing in is.
The one percent worth backing
That conviction shapes how Alfageme evaluates founders, and the math is humbling. By his estimate, at least sixty percent of entrepreneurs are building for money rather than purpose, and only a small fraction have the freedom to chase meaning at all, because the rest are paying down debts and taxes. His fund has reviewed roughly seventeen hundred startups and invested in eleven. That is well under one percent, and it is deliberate. He is not hunting for a clever product. At the earliest stage, he notes, the product will change and the market will shift. What he is hunting for is a team genuinely possessed by the problem, and he is wary of the company where the chief executive speaks of purpose while the rest of the table is thinking only about money.
What he will not outsource
Money's quiet luxury, Alfageme agrees, is the ability to buy back time by handing tasks to others. So it is telling what he refuses to delegate. At work, his fund has begun outsourcing the sourcing of deals, but never the judgment at the center of them. When it comes time to read a memo or assess a one-pager, that decision stays with the partners, because it rests on fifteen years of venture experience that, in his words, not even artificial intelligence can replicate. At home the line is just as firm. He will pay for many things, but not for someone else to pick his son up from school, because the small, unhurried time, even getting to know his child's friends, is exactly the thing money exists to protect.
What the calendar reveals
Asked what his calendar would say about him that his balance sheet never could, Alfageme offers three honest blocks of time. The first is conversation: a steady rhythm of meetings with other funds, general partners, and analysts, because venture is a referral business built on trust, and the best opportunities arrive carried by someone else's conviction. The second is deep work, which he has learned to defend on the calendar rather than leave to chance, since an open scheduling link will quietly swallow every hour a financial model or a thoughtful reply requires. The third, nearly a quarter of his week, goes to the ecosystem itself. He serves, unpaid, as president of Peru Tech Week, pouring five to ten hours a week into bringing the world to Lima, because building the community around the work is part of the work.
Why Lima belongs on the map
Pressed for something outsiders should know about Peru, Alfageme starts, unsurprisingly, with the food, a city with several of the world's most celebrated restaurants. But the deeper point is cultural. Peru's economy runs heavily on informal, independent work; a great many people's first job is selling something from a stand on their own block. He sees that as raw entrepreneurial energy waiting to be leveled up, the traditional small business nudged toward technology and venture capital. It is the same instinct that animates his fund's focus on financial technology, and especially on lending to small and midsize businesses that banks underserve, not by lending directly, but by building the infrastructure, the underwriting, risk monitoring, and verification, that lets financial institutions serve them better across the region.
Drive, balanced with humility
What finally tips Alfageme toward backing a founder is character, and he names two traits that have to sit together. The first is drive, a visible willingness to succeed. The second, holding it in balance, is humility. Venture partners probe hard, asking why this and why that, and the founders worth backing open up rather than tense. The ones who get defensive, perhaps twenty or thirty percent, are usually hiding something, he says, because a builder genuinely proud of what they are making will tell you everything. The other non-negotiable is the team. At the earliest stage the team is the pillar, which is why his fund has made only a single solo-founder investment; building a company alone is simply too hard.
He sharpens the idea with a test that doubles as a warning. Too many companies have a single commander in chief, and when that person breaks a leg or falls ill, everything stops. "That is not a team," he says. "A team is the one that can sustain a startup even when you are sick or traveling." Whitwell, who has watched the same pattern, traces it to a lack of process, of trust, and of decentralized decision-making, and offers his own rule: he would rather a teammate get something wrong, or do it differently than he would, than have everything wait on him. The reward, beyond resilience, is that capable people think differently and arrive at better ideas than the founder would have reached alone.
The deepest layer
Strip the conversation down and Alfageme keeps returning to that third layer of money, the one most people never get to organize their lives around. He has spent a decade earning the right to reach it, and now spends his days trying to route capital toward founders chasing the same thing: meaning, not merely a return. Between the venture fund, the social-housing work, the teaching, and the unpaid labor of building Lima's ecosystem, the pattern is consistent. Provision was the goal that got him here. Purpose is the work that comes next. And the truest measure of his wealth, he suggests, is not the size of the fund but the quality of the problems, and the people, he now gets to spend it on.